Source inspection
Source inspection remains connected to the wider matter or practice workflow, with responsibility and exceptions kept visible.
- Connected source records
- Named review authority
- Visible exceptions
Switching from GhostPractice
Evaluate a Controlled Move from GhostPractice to Lexuno
Assess a potential move from GhostPractice through source inspection, agreed mapping, non-destructive dry runs, exception review, reconciliation, and authorised acceptance.
No assumed connector Scoped mapping Reconciled totals Authorised cutover
Operational Scope
What to examine in switching from ghostpractice.
Each capability should be evaluated against the firm's real records, permissions, review duties, and failure conditions.
Agreed mapping
Agreed mapping remains connected to the wider matter or practice workflow, with responsibility and exceptions kept visible.
- Connected source records
- Named review authority
- Visible exceptions
Dry-run exceptions
Dry-run exceptions remains connected to the wider matter or practice workflow, with responsibility and exceptions kept visible.
- Connected source records
- Named review authority
- Visible exceptions
Accepted reconciliation
Accepted reconciliation remains connected to the wider matter or practice workflow, with responsibility and exceptions kept visible.
- Connected source records
- Named review authority
- Visible exceptions
Controlled Workflow
Move from source evidence to an accountable outcome.
The exact configuration depends on the firm's operating model, enabled workspaces, data, and assigned authorities.
Define scope
Confirm the relevant matters, records, people, roles, branches, and decision boundaries before work starts.
Connect evidence
Attach the source records and context needed to understand, review, and reconcile the work.
Review exceptions
Route incomplete, conflicting, unavailable, or permission-restricted states to the responsible person.
Record the outcome
Preserve the accepted result, remaining exceptions, responsible authority, and next action.
Evidence Boundary
Treat product evidence as scoped evidence.
Migration coverage is confirmed only after the source system, export format, record quality, attachments, financial balances, and exceptions have been inspected. No vendor import or lossless outcome is assumed.
Navigation and client input never grant access; the relevant tenant, branch, matter, record, and capability must be re-authorised.
Loading, empty, unavailable, permission-denied, failed, and retryable outcomes must remain distinguishable from success.
Software can organise evidence and workflow, but professional, regulatory, accounting, and operational decisions remain with authorised people.
Confirm the deployed environment, enabled providers, configured controls, and supported data before relying on a capability.
Switching from GhostPractice FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
Practical questions about switching from ghostpractice, authority, evidence, and product scope.
What does Lexuno mean by switching from ghostpractice?
Assess a potential move from GhostPractice through source inspection, agreed mapping, non-destructive dry runs, exception review, reconciliation, and authorised acceptance.
Does this page promise that every workflow is enabled for every firm?
No. Availability and behavior depend on the current product release, plan, configuration, permissions, providers, and the firm's accepted operating model.
How should a firm evaluate this capability?
Use representative records and end-to-end scenarios, including empty, permission-denied, provider-unavailable, failed, exception, and reconciliation states.
Does Lexuno replace professional advice or accountable review?
No. Lexuno provides operational software. Legal, regulatory, accounting, security, and professional decisions remain separate responsibilities.
How should access be verified?
Test the exact tenant, branch, matter, record, role, and capability boundaries server-side. Visible navigation alone is not authorisation evidence.
Evaluate switching from ghostpractice against your real operating model.
Use representative workflows and request current product evidence for the scope that matters to your firm.